#9837: "When using the investigator, it sometimes gives false information. "
Про що цей звіт?
Що трапилося? Будь ласка, виберіть нижче
Що трапилося? Будь ласка, виберіть нижче
Будь ласка, перевірте, чи вже є звіт на цю тему
Якщо це так, будь ласка, ПРОГОЛОСУЙТЕ за цей звіт. Звіти з найбільшою кількістю голосів розглядатимуть У ПЕРШУ ЧЕРГУ!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Детальний опис
-
• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте повідомлення про помилку, якщо ви бачите якесь на своєму екрані.
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
-
• Будь ласка, опишіть, що ви намагалися зробити, що зробили, та що трапилось
Move #32 when lachimi put the investigator on Rick's Cafe. It showed him 1 match 0 adjacent. However he actually had China Town,Police Corruption,Pop. Police Corruption was on Rick's Cafe and Pop was adjacent so it should have said 1 match 1 adjacent.
In the most blatant case was move 114 where Pseudo first used a downtown evidence card which showed him 1 adjacent. Then he put an investigator there and it showed him no matches...
This glitch has caused serious confusion and frustration, hopefully it can be fixed ASAP. • Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте текст відображений англійською замість вашої мови. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Чи цей текст доступний у системі перекладів? Якщо так, то чи перекладали його понад 24 години тому?
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Будь ласка, поясніть вашу пропозицію точно й лаконічно, щоб було якомога легше зрозуміти, що ви маєте на увазі.
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Що було на екрані до того, як ваша гра заблокувалася (Порожній екран? Частина ігрового інтерфейсу? Повідомлення про помилку?)
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Які саме правила були порушені адаптацією гри на BGA
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
-
• Чи видні порушення правил на повторі гри? Якщо так, на якому кроці?
Move #32 when lachimi put the investigator on Rick's Cafe. It showed him 1 match 0 adjacent. However he actually had China Town,Police Corruption,Pop. Police Corruption was on Rick's Cafe and Pop was adjacent so it should have said 1 match 1 adjacent.
In the most blatant case was move 114 where Pseudo first used a downtown evidence card which showed him 1 adjacent. Then he put an investigator there and it showed him no matches...
This glitch has caused serious confusion and frustration, hopefully it can be fixed ASAP. • Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Яку ігрову дію ви намагалися виконати?
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
-
• Що ви намагались зробити, щоб активувати цю ігрову дію?
Move #32 when lachimi put the investigator on Rick's Cafe. It showed him 1 match 0 adjacent. However he actually had China Town,Police Corruption,Pop. Police Corruption was on Rick's Cafe and Pop was adjacent so it should have said 1 match 1 adjacent.
In the most blatant case was move 114 where Pseudo first used a downtown evidence card which showed him 1 adjacent. Then he put an investigator there and it showed him no matches...
This glitch has caused serious confusion and frustration, hopefully it can be fixed ASAP. -
• Що сталося, коли Ви намагалися виконати цю дію (текст помилки, статус на панелі повідомлень, ...)?
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v66
-
• На якому етапі гри виникла проблема (яка була на той момент вказівка в грі)?
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
-
• Що стається, коли ви намагаєтесь зробити ігрову дію (повідомлення про помилку, повідомлення на панелі статусу гри і т.п.)?
Move #32 when lachimi put the investigator on Rick's Cafe. It showed him 1 match 0 adjacent. However he actually had China Town,Police Corruption,Pop. Police Corruption was on Rick's Cafe and Pop was adjacent so it should have said 1 match 1 adjacent.
In the most blatant case was move 114 where Pseudo first used a downtown evidence card which showed him 1 adjacent. Then he put an investigator there and it showed him no matches...
This glitch has caused serious confusion and frustration, hopefully it can be fixed ASAP. • Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Будь ласка, опишіть візуальну помилку. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте текст відображений англійською замість вашої мови. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Чи цей текст доступний у системі перекладів? Якщо так, то чи перекладали його понад 24 години тому?
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Будь ласка, поясніть вашу пропозицію точно й лаконічно, щоб було якомога легше зрозуміти, що ви маєте на увазі.
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v66
Історія звітів
I think I understand why it's making that mistake, nonetheless it's a serious bug and right now I am asking all of my opponents to verify my information as well as their own to prevent suffering from the glitch.
So, to improve the wording of the game log, I see two options:
1. "$player sent an investigator to $location. *New* matches: ...."
2. "$player sent an investigator to $location. Matches: $correctnumber"
If I go for 2., would it confuse players if it says, e.g. "matches: 1 exact, 1 adjacent" an then only 1 token appears on the investigator tile, because the other token is already on the aspect tile? Obviously moving the token from a tile to the investigator is not an option as this would reduce the amount information again (which doesn't make sense).
would be taken into consideration by the player holding the Case cards, making sure that a specific tile did not receive another disc or cube.“
So, if going by that, one could argue that the game log should as closely as possible imitate a real player, then the log should say something like: “Place 1 disc onto the investigator.”, really only talking about the new tokens.
“$player‘s investigator finds new information at $location: X disc(s), Y cube(s).”
#55
The answer is China Town, Knuckles, Bank job.
and I put my investigator on China Town square, which is neighbor of both Knuckles and Bank Job(there's a disc on Bank job). The right info should be "1 disc, 2 cubes", but it only shows "1 disc, 1 cube".
#77
The answer is Doc, Trocadero, Jewellery Heist
I put my investigator on the square below Jewellery Heist(already had a disc on it), which is not neighbor others, but this time I got a cube, indicated "Jewellery Heist".
"If you already have discs and/or cubes in the location then these would be taken into consideration by the player holding the Case cards, making sure that a specific tile did not receive another disc or cube."
On #40141874 #55
I already got a cube on that location and it's should be take into consideration, no duplicate info should given by investigator.
Is there a way to make it more visually obvious when this happens? Perhaps animate the cube moving from the location to the investigator then back to the location?
Додайте що-небудь до цього відгуку
- ID іншого столу / ходу
- F5 вирішило проблему?
- Чи виникає проблема періодично? Щоразу? Випадково?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
