• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте повідомлення про помилку, якщо ви бачите якесь на своєму екрані.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Будь ласка, опишіть, що ви намагалися зробити, що зробили, та що трапилось

• Який у вас браузер?

• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте текст відображений англійською замість вашої мови. Якщо ви маєте знімок екрана з помилкою (рекомендована практика), то можете використати Imgur.com, щоб завантажити його, та скопіювати посилання на нього сюди.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Чи цей текст доступний у системі перекладів? Якщо так, то чи перекладали його понад 24 години тому?

• Який у вас браузер?

• Будь ласка, поясніть вашу пропозицію точно й лаконічно, щоб було якомога легше зрозуміти, що ви маєте на увазі.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Який у вас браузер?

• Що було на екрані до того, як ваша гра заблокувалася (Порожній екран? Частина ігрового інтерфейсу? Повідомлення про помилку?)

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Який у вас браузер?

• Які саме правила були порушені адаптацією гри на BGA

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Чи видні порушення правил на повторі гри? Якщо так, на якому кроці?

• Який у вас браузер?

• Яку ігрову дію ви намагалися виконати?

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Що ви намагались зробити, щоб активувати цю ігрову дію?

• Що сталося, коли Ви намагалися виконати цю дію (текст помилки, статус на панелі повідомлень, ...)?

• Який у вас браузер?

• На якому етапі гри виникла проблема (яка була на той момент вказівка в грі)?

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Що стається, коли ви намагаєтесь зробити ігрову дію (повідомлення про помилку, повідомлення на панелі статусу гри і т.п.)?

• Який у вас браузер?

• Будь ласка, опишіть візуальну помилку. Якщо ви маєте знімок екрана з помилкою (рекомендована практика), то можете використати Imgur.com, щоб завантажити його, та скопіювати посилання на нього сюди.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Який у вас браузер?

• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте текст відображений англійською замість вашої мови. Якщо ви маєте знімок екрана з помилкою (рекомендована практика), то можете використати Imgur.com, щоб завантажити його, та скопіювати посилання на нього сюди.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Чи цей текст доступний у системі перекладів? Якщо так, то чи перекладали його понад 24 години тому?

• Який у вас браузер?

• Будь ласка, поясніть вашу пропозицію точно й лаконічно, щоб було якомога легше зрозуміти, що ви маєте на увазі.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Який у вас браузер?