#77164: "Defence Blocking Cost"
Про що цей звіт?
Що трапилося? Будь ласка, виберіть нижче
Що трапилося? Будь ласка, виберіть нижче
Будь ласка, перевірте, чи вже є звіт на цю тему
Якщо це так, будь ласка, ПРОГОЛОСУЙТЕ за цей звіт. Звіти з найбільшою кількістю голосів розглядатимуть У ПЕРШУ ЧЕРГУ!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Детальний опис
-
• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте повідомлення про помилку, якщо ви бачите якесь на своєму екрані.
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... -
• Будь ласка, опишіть, що ви намагалися зробити, що зробили, та що трапилось
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте текст відображений англійською замість вашої мови. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Чи цей текст доступний у системі перекладів? Якщо так, то чи перекладали його понад 24 години тому?
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... • Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Будь ласка, поясніть вашу пропозицію точно й лаконічно, щоб було якомога легше зрозуміти, що ви маєте на увазі.
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... • Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Що було на екрані до того, як ваша гра заблокувалася (Порожній екран? Частина ігрового інтерфейсу? Повідомлення про помилку?)
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... • Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Які саме правила були порушені адаптацією гри на BGA
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... -
• Чи видні порушення правил на повторі гри? Якщо так, на якому кроці?
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Яку ігрову дію ви намагалися виконати?
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... -
• Що ви намагались зробити, щоб активувати цю ігрову дію?
-
• Що сталося, коли Ви намагалися виконати цю дію (текст помилки, статус на панелі повідомлень, ...)?
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v107
-
• На якому етапі гри виникла проблема (яка була на той момент вказівка в грі)?
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... -
• Що стається, коли ви намагаєтесь зробити ігрову дію (повідомлення про помилку, повідомлення на панелі статусу гри і т.п.)?
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Будь ласка, опишіть візуальну помилку. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... • Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте текст відображений англійською замість вашої мови. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Чи цей текст доступний у системі перекладів? Якщо так, то чи перекладали його понад 24 години тому?
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... • Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Будь ласка, поясніть вашу пропозицію точно й лаконічно, щоб було якомога легше зрозуміти, що ви маєте на увазі.
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... • Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v107
Історія звітів
Your bug has probably been fixed already, or was linked to a temporary failure of BGA service.
In any case, when filling a bug report, make sure to have an explicit title linked to the incident (ex: with error message), so other players can recognize it and vote for it.
Додайте що-небудь до цього відгуку
- ID іншого столу / ходу
- F5 вирішило проблему?
- Чи виникає проблема періодично? Щоразу? Випадково?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
