• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте повідомлення про помилку, якщо ви бачите якесь на своєму екрані.

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Будь ласка, опишіть, що ви намагалися зробити, що зробили, та що трапилось

the described situation occurs between moves 155 and 163 Table #286876848

• Який у вас браузер?

• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте текст відображений англійською замість вашої мови. Якщо у вас є скріншот цієї помилки (рекомендовано), ви можете скористатися будь-яким сервісом для зберігання зображень (наприклад, snipboard.io), завантажити його та вставити сюди посилання. Чи цей текст доступний у системі перекладів? Якщо так, то чи перекладали його понад 24 години тому?

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Який у вас браузер?

• Будь ласка, поясніть вашу пропозицію точно й лаконічно, щоб було якомога легше зрозуміти, що ви маєте на увазі.

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Який у вас браузер?

• Що було на екрані до того, як ваша гра заблокувалася (Порожній екран? Частина ігрового інтерфейсу? Повідомлення про помилку?)

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Який у вас браузер?

• Які саме правила були порушені адаптацією гри на BGA

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Чи видні порушення правил на повторі гри? Якщо так, на якому кроці?

the described situation occurs between moves 155 and 163 Table #286876848

• Який у вас браузер?

• Яку ігрову дію ви намагалися виконати?

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Що ви намагались зробити, щоб активувати цю ігрову дію?

the described situation occurs between moves 155 and 163 Table #286876848

• Що сталося, коли Ви намагалися виконати цю дію (текст помилки, статус на панелі повідомлень, ...)?

• Який у вас браузер?

• На якому етапі гри виникла проблема (яка була на той момент вказівка в грі)?

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Що стається, коли ви намагаєтесь зробити ігрову дію (повідомлення про помилку, повідомлення на панелі статусу гри і т.п.)?

the described situation occurs between moves 155 and 163 Table #286876848

• Який у вас браузер?

• Будь ласка, опишіть візуальну помилку. Якщо у вас є скріншот цієї помилки (рекомендовано), ви можете скористатися будь-яким сервісом для зберігання зображень (наприклад, snipboard.io), завантажити його та вставити сюди посилання.

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Який у вас браузер?

• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте текст відображений англійською замість вашої мови. Якщо у вас є скріншот цієї помилки (рекомендовано), ви можете скористатися будь-яким сервісом для зберігання зображень (наприклад, snipboard.io), завантажити його та вставити сюди посилання. Чи цей текст доступний у системі перекладів? Якщо так, то чи перекладали його понад 24 години тому?

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Який у вас браузер?

• Будь ласка, поясніть вашу пропозицію точно й лаконічно, щоб було якомога легше зрозуміти, що ви маєте на увазі.

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Який у вас браузер?