• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте повідомлення про помилку, якщо ви бачите якесь на своєму екрані.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Будь ласка, опишіть, що ви намагалися зробити, що зробили, та що трапилось

• Який у вас браузер?

• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте текст відображений англійською замість вашої мови. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Чи цей текст доступний у системі перекладів? Якщо так, то чи перекладали його понад 24 години тому?

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Який у вас браузер?

• Будь ласка, поясніть вашу пропозицію точно й лаконічно, щоб було якомога легше зрозуміти, що ви маєте на увазі.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Який у вас браузер?

• Що було на екрані до того, як ваша гра заблокувалася (Порожній екран? Частина ігрового інтерфейсу? Повідомлення про помилку?)

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Який у вас браузер?

• Які саме правила були порушені адаптацією гри на BGA

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Чи видні порушення правил на повторі гри? Якщо так, на якому кроці?

• Який у вас браузер?

• Яку ігрову дію ви намагалися виконати?

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Що ви намагались зробити, щоб активувати цю ігрову дію?

• Що сталося, коли Ви намагалися виконати цю дію (текст помилки, статус на панелі повідомлень, ...)?

• Який у вас браузер?

• На якому етапі гри виникла проблема (яка була на той момент вказівка в грі)?

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Що стається, коли ви намагаєтесь зробити ігрову дію (повідомлення про помилку, повідомлення на панелі статусу гри і т.п.)?

• Який у вас браузер?

• Будь ласка, опишіть візуальну помилку. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Який у вас браузер?

• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте текст відображений англійською замість вашої мови. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Чи цей текст доступний у системі перекладів? Якщо так, то чи перекладали його понад 24 години тому?

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Який у вас браузер?

• Будь ласка, поясніть вашу пропозицію точно й лаконічно, щоб було якомога легше зрозуміти, що ви маєте на увазі.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Який у вас браузер?