#141522: "As requested: Cards which didn't score correctly in my game"
Про що цей звіт?
Що трапилося? Будь ласка, виберіть нижче
Що трапилося? Будь ласка, виберіть нижче
Будь ласка, перевірте, чи вже є звіт на цю тему
Якщо це так, будь ласка, ПРОГОЛОСУЙТЕ за цей звіт. Звіти з найбільшою кількістю голосів розглядатимуть У ПЕРШУ ЧЕРГУ!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Детальний опис
-
• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте повідомлення про помилку, якщо ви бачите якесь на своєму екрані.
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• Будь ласка, опишіть, що ви намагалися зробити, що зробили, та що трапилось
Noted above inline.
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте текст відображений англійською замість вашої мови. Якщо ви маєте знімок екрана з помилкою (рекомендована практика), то можете використати Imgur.com, щоб завантажити його, та скопіювати посилання на нього сюди.
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• Чи цей текст доступний у системі перекладів? Якщо так, то чи перекладали його понад 24 години тому?
Noted above inline.
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Будь ласка, поясніть вашу пропозицію точно й лаконічно, щоб було якомога легше зрозуміти, що ви маєте на увазі.
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Що було на екрані до того, як ваша гра заблокувалася (Порожній екран? Частина ігрового інтерфейсу? Повідомлення про помилку?)
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Які саме правила були порушені адаптацією гри на BGA
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• Чи видні порушення правил на повторі гри? Якщо так, на якому кроці?
Noted above inline.
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Яку ігрову дію ви намагалися виконати?
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• Що ви намагались зробити, щоб активувати цю ігрову дію?
Noted above inline.
-
• Що сталося, коли Ви намагалися виконати цю дію (текст помилки, статус на панелі повідомлень, ...)?
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v128
-
• На якому етапі гри виникла проблема (яка була на той момент вказівка в грі)?
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• Що стається, коли ви намагаєтесь зробити ігрову дію (повідомлення про помилку, повідомлення на панелі статусу гри і т.п.)?
Noted above inline.
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Будь ласка, опишіть візуальну помилку. Якщо ви маєте знімок екрана з помилкою (рекомендована практика), то можете використати Imgur.com, щоб завантажити його, та скопіювати посилання на нього сюди.
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте текст відображений англійською замість вашої мови. Якщо ви маєте знімок екрана з помилкою (рекомендована практика), то можете використати Imgur.com, щоб завантажити його, та скопіювати посилання на нього сюди.
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• Чи цей текст доступний у системі перекладів? Якщо так, то чи перекладали його понад 24 години тому?
Noted above inline.
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Будь ласка, поясніть вашу пропозицію точно й лаконічно, щоб було якомога легше зрозуміти, що ви маєте на увазі.
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v128
Історія звітів
I will begin investigating this.
The pathing algorithm is arduous. I've rewritten it completely and it I still find insidious bugs like this on occasion.
Thank you for your detailed reporting. It helped tremendously.
As a retired software engineer, I can appreciate the complexities involved, and need for good detail in bug reports.
Some of these did not involve changes to the longest path, so I wonder it there might be other things to look at:
While moves 18 and 40 involved changes to the longest path at the time, AND were values that coincided with the path changes, moves 43, 48, and 55 increased the amount of missing points by 5 points at the same time a new berry should have been scoring pointing to a possible issue with berry scoring.
43 also involved changed to the sum for longest path, but 48, and 55 did not, although 55 did cover part of the width of a still counted path segment, but the increase in the score differential (5 vp) indicated a berry missed which was just added.
Hope this helps and curious if you think even 43, 48, and 55 would be fixed as it sounds like they may not be yet.
Since you're technically inclined, you may find it interested to open the browser javascript console and type TBP.players[93239080]["subscore"] to see a breakdown of your score at any point in the game or replay.
Додайте що-небудь до цього відгуку
- ID іншого столу / ходу
- F5 вирішило проблему?
- Чи виникає проблема періодично? Щоразу? Випадково?
- Якщо ви маєте знімок екрана з помилкою (рекомендована практика), то можете використати Imgur.com, щоб завантажити його, та скопіювати посилання на нього сюди.
