#117504: "Pudding is incorrectly awards negative points"
Про що цей звіт?
Що трапилося? Будь ласка, виберіть нижче
Що трапилося? Будь ласка, виберіть нижче
Будь ласка, перевірте, чи вже є звіт на цю тему
Якщо це так, будь ласка, ПРОГОЛОСУЙТЕ за цей звіт. Звіти з найбільшою кількістю голосів розглядатимуть У ПЕРШУ ЧЕРГУ!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Детальний опис
-
• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте повідомлення про помилку, якщо ви бачите якесь на своєму екрані.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• Будь ласка, опишіть, що ви намагалися зробити, що зробили, та що трапилось
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
• Який у вас браузер?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте текст відображений англійською замість вашої мови. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Чи цей текст доступний у системі перекладів? Якщо так, то чи перекладали його понад 24 години тому?
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Який у вас браузер?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Будь ласка, поясніть вашу пропозицію точно й лаконічно, щоб було якомога легше зрозуміти, що ви маєте на увазі.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Який у вас браузер?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Що було на екрані до того, як ваша гра заблокувалася (Порожній екран? Частина ігрового інтерфейсу? Повідомлення про помилку?)
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Який у вас браузер?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Які саме правила були порушені адаптацією гри на BGA
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• Чи видні порушення правил на повторі гри? Якщо так, на якому кроці?
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
• Який у вас браузер?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Яку ігрову дію ви намагалися виконати?
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• Що ви намагались зробити, щоб активувати цю ігрову дію?
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
-
• Що сталося, коли Ви намагалися виконати цю дію (текст помилки, статус на панелі повідомлень, ...)?
• Який у вас браузер?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• На якому етапі гри виникла проблема (яка була на той момент вказівка в грі)?
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• Що стається, коли ви намагаєтесь зробити ігрову дію (повідомлення про помилку, повідомлення на панелі статусу гри і т.п.)?
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
• Який у вас браузер?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Будь ласка, опишіть візуальну помилку. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Який у вас браузер?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте текст відображений англійською замість вашої мови. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Чи цей текст доступний у системі перекладів? Якщо так, то чи перекладали його понад 24 години тому?
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Який у вас браузер?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Будь ласка, поясніть вашу пропозицію точно й лаконічно, щоб було якомога легше зрозуміти, що ви маєте на увазі.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Який у вас браузер?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
Історія звітів
BGG's interpretation(?):
The player(s) with the least number of pudding cards in their tableau, and any player(s) with no collected pudding cards lose 6 points.
Everyone else's interpretation (as far as I'm aware):
The player with the least number of pudding cards loses 6 points, where having zero pudding cards is considered less than having one pudding card.
As far as I can tell, the "including 0" is just to note that you can't get out of the penalty by "not playing" and avoiding collecting any pudding cards.
The example the rules give is:
> Example: Chris has 4 pudding cards,
> Meredith has 2, and Kerry and Andrew
> have 1. Chris scores 6 points. Kerry and
> Andrew both lose 6 points.
This suggests to me BGA is incorrect, otherwise they're being self-inconsistent by treating 1 vs 0 differently from 2 vs 1.
Your bug has probably been fixed already, or was linked to a temporary failure of BGA service.
In any case, when filling a bug report, make sure to have an explicit title linked to the incident (ex: with error message), so other players can recognize it and vote for it.
Додайте що-небудь до цього відгуку
- ID іншого столу / ходу
- F5 вирішило проблему?
- Чи виникає проблема періодично? Щоразу? Випадково?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
