• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте повідомлення про помилку, якщо ви бачите якесь на своєму екрані.

Lords card states "Build the most settlements in each sector. Each sector: 12 gold for the maximum number of settlements there; 6 gold for the next highest number."

In a two player game my opponent had ZERO settlements in a quadrant but got awarded 6 gold.

Surely you can't get 6 gold for doing nothing? They did not "build" any settlements in that sector, as per the card wording.

This is unfair since if a player uses settlements to get the highest number in other sectors, it's not fair that they get 6 gold for putting nothing in the remaining sector.

• Будь ласка, опишіть, що ви намагалися зробити, що зробили, та що трапилось

Last move

• Який у вас браузер?

• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте текст відображений англійською замість вашої мови. Якщо у вас є скріншот цієї помилки (рекомендовано), ви можете скористатися будь-яким сервісом для зберігання зображень (наприклад, snipboard.io), завантажити його та вставити сюди посилання. Чи цей текст доступний у системі перекладів? Якщо так, то чи перекладали його понад 24 години тому?

Lords card states "Build the most settlements in each sector. Each sector: 12 gold for the maximum number of settlements there; 6 gold for the next highest number."

In a two player game my opponent had ZERO settlements in a quadrant but got awarded 6 gold.

Surely you can't get 6 gold for doing nothing? They did not "build" any settlements in that sector, as per the card wording.

This is unfair since if a player uses settlements to get the highest number in other sectors, it's not fair that they get 6 gold for putting nothing in the remaining sector.

• Який у вас браузер?

• Будь ласка, поясніть вашу пропозицію точно й лаконічно, щоб було якомога легше зрозуміти, що ви маєте на увазі.

Lords card states "Build the most settlements in each sector. Each sector: 12 gold for the maximum number of settlements there; 6 gold for the next highest number."

In a two player game my opponent had ZERO settlements in a quadrant but got awarded 6 gold.

Surely you can't get 6 gold for doing nothing? They did not "build" any settlements in that sector, as per the card wording.

This is unfair since if a player uses settlements to get the highest number in other sectors, it's not fair that they get 6 gold for putting nothing in the remaining sector.

• Який у вас браузер?

• Що було на екрані до того, як ваша гра заблокувалася (Порожній екран? Частина ігрового інтерфейсу? Повідомлення про помилку?)

Lords card states "Build the most settlements in each sector. Each sector: 12 gold for the maximum number of settlements there; 6 gold for the next highest number."

In a two player game my opponent had ZERO settlements in a quadrant but got awarded 6 gold.

Surely you can't get 6 gold for doing nothing? They did not "build" any settlements in that sector, as per the card wording.

This is unfair since if a player uses settlements to get the highest number in other sectors, it's not fair that they get 6 gold for putting nothing in the remaining sector.

• Який у вас браузер?

• Які саме правила були порушені адаптацією гри на BGA

Lords card states "Build the most settlements in each sector. Each sector: 12 gold for the maximum number of settlements there; 6 gold for the next highest number."

In a two player game my opponent had ZERO settlements in a quadrant but got awarded 6 gold.

Surely you can't get 6 gold for doing nothing? They did not "build" any settlements in that sector, as per the card wording.

This is unfair since if a player uses settlements to get the highest number in other sectors, it's not fair that they get 6 gold for putting nothing in the remaining sector.

• Чи видні порушення правил на повторі гри? Якщо так, на якому кроці?

Last move

• Який у вас браузер?

• Яку ігрову дію ви намагалися виконати?

Lords card states "Build the most settlements in each sector. Each sector: 12 gold for the maximum number of settlements there; 6 gold for the next highest number."

In a two player game my opponent had ZERO settlements in a quadrant but got awarded 6 gold.

Surely you can't get 6 gold for doing nothing? They did not "build" any settlements in that sector, as per the card wording.

This is unfair since if a player uses settlements to get the highest number in other sectors, it's not fair that they get 6 gold for putting nothing in the remaining sector.

• Що ви намагались зробити, щоб активувати цю ігрову дію?

Last move

• Що сталося, коли Ви намагалися виконати цю дію (текст помилки, статус на панелі повідомлень, ...)?

• Який у вас браузер?

• На якому етапі гри виникла проблема (яка була на той момент вказівка в грі)?

Lords card states "Build the most settlements in each sector. Each sector: 12 gold for the maximum number of settlements there; 6 gold for the next highest number."

In a two player game my opponent had ZERO settlements in a quadrant but got awarded 6 gold.

Surely you can't get 6 gold for doing nothing? They did not "build" any settlements in that sector, as per the card wording.

This is unfair since if a player uses settlements to get the highest number in other sectors, it's not fair that they get 6 gold for putting nothing in the remaining sector.

• Що стається, коли ви намагаєтесь зробити ігрову дію (повідомлення про помилку, повідомлення на панелі статусу гри і т.п.)?

Last move

• Який у вас браузер?

• Будь ласка, опишіть візуальну помилку. Якщо у вас є скріншот цієї помилки (рекомендовано), ви можете скористатися будь-яким сервісом для зберігання зображень (наприклад, snipboard.io), завантажити його та вставити сюди посилання.

Lords card states "Build the most settlements in each sector. Each sector: 12 gold for the maximum number of settlements there; 6 gold for the next highest number."

In a two player game my opponent had ZERO settlements in a quadrant but got awarded 6 gold.

Surely you can't get 6 gold for doing nothing? They did not "build" any settlements in that sector, as per the card wording.

This is unfair since if a player uses settlements to get the highest number in other sectors, it's not fair that they get 6 gold for putting nothing in the remaining sector.

• Який у вас браузер?

• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте текст відображений англійською замість вашої мови. Якщо у вас є скріншот цієї помилки (рекомендовано), ви можете скористатися будь-яким сервісом для зберігання зображень (наприклад, snipboard.io), завантажити його та вставити сюди посилання. Чи цей текст доступний у системі перекладів? Якщо так, то чи перекладали його понад 24 години тому?

Lords card states "Build the most settlements in each sector. Each sector: 12 gold for the maximum number of settlements there; 6 gold for the next highest number."

In a two player game my opponent had ZERO settlements in a quadrant but got awarded 6 gold.

Surely you can't get 6 gold for doing nothing? They did not "build" any settlements in that sector, as per the card wording.

This is unfair since if a player uses settlements to get the highest number in other sectors, it's not fair that they get 6 gold for putting nothing in the remaining sector.

• Який у вас браузер?

• Будь ласка, поясніть вашу пропозицію точно й лаконічно, щоб було якомога легше зрозуміти, що ви маєте на увазі.

Lords card states "Build the most settlements in each sector. Each sector: 12 gold for the maximum number of settlements there; 6 gold for the next highest number."

In a two player game my opponent had ZERO settlements in a quadrant but got awarded 6 gold.

Surely you can't get 6 gold for doing nothing? They did not "build" any settlements in that sector, as per the card wording.

This is unfair since if a player uses settlements to get the highest number in other sectors, it's not fair that they get 6 gold for putting nothing in the remaining sector.

• Який у вас браузер?