#110545: "Show the setup card and give more setup information in the game options"
Про що цей звіт?
Що трапилося? Будь ласка, виберіть нижче
Що трапилося? Будь ласка, виберіть нижче
Будь ласка, перевірте, чи вже є звіт на цю тему
Якщо це так, будь ласка, ПРОГОЛОСУЙТЕ за цей звіт. Звіти з найбільшою кількістю голосів розглядатимуть У ПЕРШУ ЧЕРГУ!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Детальний опис
-
• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте повідомлення про помилку, якщо ви бачите якесь на своєму екрані.
I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.
Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...
The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.
So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.
Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.
Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.
This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.
This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.
-
• Будь ласка, опишіть, що ви намагалися зробити, що зробили, та що трапилось
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте текст відображений англійською замість вашої мови. Якщо у вас є скріншот цієї помилки (рекомендовано), ви можете скористатися будь-яким сервісом для зберігання зображень (наприклад, snipboard.io), завантажити його та вставити сюди посилання. Чи цей текст доступний у системі перекладів? Якщо так, то чи перекладали його понад 24 години тому?
I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.
Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...
The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.
So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.
Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.
Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.
This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.
This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Будь ласка, поясніть вашу пропозицію точно й лаконічно, щоб було якомога легше зрозуміти, що ви маєте на увазі.
I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.
Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...
The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.
So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.
Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.
Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.
This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.
This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Що було на екрані до того, як ваша гра заблокувалася (Порожній екран? Частина ігрового інтерфейсу? Повідомлення про помилку?)
I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.
Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...
The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.
So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.
Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.
Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.
This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.
This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Які саме правила були порушені адаптацією гри на BGA
I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.
Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...
The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.
So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.
Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.
Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.
This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.
This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.
-
• Чи видні порушення правил на повторі гри? Якщо так, на якому кроці?
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Яку ігрову дію ви намагалися виконати?
I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.
Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...
The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.
So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.
Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.
Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.
This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.
This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.
-
• Що ви намагались зробити, щоб активувати цю ігрову дію?
-
• Що сталося, коли Ви намагалися виконати цю дію (текст помилки, статус на панелі повідомлень, ...)?
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v120
-
• На якому етапі гри виникла проблема (яка була на той момент вказівка в грі)?
I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.
Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...
The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.
So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.
Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.
Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.
This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.
This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.
-
• Що стається, коли ви намагаєтесь зробити ігрову дію (повідомлення про помилку, повідомлення на панелі статусу гри і т.п.)?
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Будь ласка, опишіть візуальну помилку. Якщо у вас є скріншот цієї помилки (рекомендовано), ви можете скористатися будь-яким сервісом для зберігання зображень (наприклад, snipboard.io), завантажити його та вставити сюди посилання.
I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.
Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...
The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.
So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.
Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.
Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.
This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.
This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Будь ласка, скопіюйте/вставте текст відображений англійською замість вашої мови. Якщо у вас є скріншот цієї помилки (рекомендовано), ви можете скористатися будь-яким сервісом для зберігання зображень (наприклад, snipboard.io), завантажити його та вставити сюди посилання. Чи цей текст доступний у системі перекладів? Якщо так, то чи перекладали його понад 24 години тому?
I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.
Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...
The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.
So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.
Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.
Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.
This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.
This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Будь ласка, поясніть вашу пропозицію точно й лаконічно, щоб було якомога легше зрозуміти, що ви маєте на увазі.
I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.
Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...
The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.
So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.
Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.
Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.
This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.
This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.
• Який у вас браузер?
Google Chrome v120
Історія звітів
I agree that player's should need to open the rulebook just to see what the setup consists of, but I don't want to go so far as to start making lists of items underneath the pulldown.
This information is well-suited for the How to Play section, which is a user-editable wiki. That section is also linked to prominently from BGA's new game start page. Meanwhile, if you have succinct changes for the pull-down descriptions, I'm happy to make those too, but it's going to need to be a summary in a few words rather than a list. Just follow up here with rewording suggestions and I'll reopen.
Note that I don't mean the text in the pull-down menus (those have to stand on 1 line) but the text just below once the options has been selected.
For the French version of the wiki that is.
Додайте що-небудь до цього відгуку
- ID іншого столу / ходу
- F5 вирішило проблему?
- Чи виникає проблема періодично? Щоразу? Випадково?
- Якщо у вас є скріншот цієї помилки (рекомендовано), ви можете скористатися будь-яким сервісом для зберігання зображень (наприклад, snipboard.io), завантажити його та вставити сюди посилання.
